Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

The Toxic Drug Situation Isn’t a Mystery. It’s a Policy Failure.

The overdose crisis didn’t sneak up on us. It didn’t arrive overnight. It didn’t happen because people suddenly stopped caring about their lives.

It happened because we built systems that treat human suffering as a moral problem, not a structural one.

I’ve lived on both sides of this crisis. I spent 16 years using cocaine, alcohol, and opiates. I survived overdoses. I buried friends. I cycled through detox, abstinence mandates, criminalization, and treatment models that promised recovery but delivered containment. Today, I work & live my life in recovery, and I watch the same patterns repeat and kill my friends.

What we are witnessing is not simply just a toxic drug crisis. It is a policy, treatment, and care-delivery failure.

Prohibition Didn’t Create Safety. It Created Volatility.

Drugs didn’t suddenly become dangerous. Markets became unregulated.

When substances are driven underground, potency rises, quality control disappears, and risk concentrates at the user level. Fentanyl did not “cause” the overdose crisis; it exploited a prohibition-based system that rewards concealment and concentration.

The BC Coroners Service has consistently reported that the majority of overdose deaths occur indoors, often when individuals are using alone with a toxic and unpredictable supply:

https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/life-events/death/coroners-service/statistical-reports

At the federal level, Health Canada has repeatedly identified illicit supply toxicity, criminalization, and isolation as primary drivers of overdose mortality:

https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/substance-use/problematic-prescription-drug-use/opioids.html

This crisis was not accidental. It was engineered by policy choices that prioritized punishment over protection.

Detox Without Stabilization Is One of the Deadliest Gaps in Care

Detox is often presented as a solution. In reality, detox without stabilization dramatically increases the risk of death.

Physiologically, detox lowers tolerance. Psychologically, it often releases people back into the same stressors, trauma triggers, and survival environments that drove use in the first place. Socially, it frequently returns people to isolation.

The National Institute on Drug Abuse warns that overdose risk spikes sharply after detox and incarceration due to reduced tolerance:

https://nida.nih.gov/research-topics/overdose-prevention

A large cohort study published in The BMJ found mortality rates many times higher in the weeks following detox discharge:

https://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj.c3172

Yet our systems continue to prioritize throughput over continuity. Beds turn over. Funding resets. Responsibility dissolves. People die in the gap.

Criminalization Deepens Trauma and Isolation

Criminalization does not deter substance use; it reshapes behaviour in dangerous ways.

Fear of arrest drives people to:

  • use alone
  • rush doses
  • avoid medical care
  • hide relapse
  • disengage from services
  • poor experiences in treatment settings leading to lack of desire to attend

A comprehensive review in The Lancet directly links criminalization with increased overdose mortality, infectious disease transmission, and barriers to care:

https://www.thelancet.com/series/drug-use-and-health

Even modest policy shifts toward decriminalization in Canada have demonstrated early reductions in stigma and increased engagement, though implementation remains inconsistent:

https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/news/2023/01/health-canada-implements-drug-decriminalization-pilot-project-in-british-columbia.html

Punishment does not heal trauma. It compounds it.

Why Criminalization Persists (And Why That Matters)

If criminalization failed on every metric that mattered, overdose deaths, public safety, fiscal efficiency, it would have been abandoned decades ago.

It hasn’t been.

Because prohibition is not only a policy choice; it is an economic system.

Illegality justifies enforcement budgets. Enforcement budgets sustain institutions. Institutions rarely vote themselves out of relevance.

Drug prohibition underwrites ongoing public spending on:

  • policing and surveillance
  • incarceration and mandated treatment
  • courts and corrections
  • border enforcement
  • pharmaceutical alternatives that don’t meet the needs of people who use drugs
  • military and paramilitary equipment
  • private security and defense contracting

The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives has documented how enforcement-heavy drug policy absorbs vast public resources while delivering little public health benefit:

https://policyalternatives.ca/publications/monitor/war-drugs-costly-failure

Internationally, the Global Commission on Drug Policy has concluded that the war on drugs persists despite failure in large part due to institutional inertia and vested economic interests:

https://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/reports

Illegality creates a perpetual emergency. That emergency justifies expanding police powers, surveillance authorities, weapons procurement, and military-style enforcement frameworks.

Civil asset forfeiture further distorts incentives, allowing enforcement agencies to seize cash and property linked to drug activity, often without conviction, creating direct financial motivation to maintain prohibition:

https://ij.org/issues/private-property/civil-forfeiture

Globally, militarized drug enforcement has failed to reduce supply while increasing violence and instability, a reality acknowledged by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime:

https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/world-drug-report.html

When illegality is economically useful, human outcomes become secondary.

People who use drugs are no longer treated as citizens in need of care. They become justification for budgets, equipment, and authority.

Why Many Conventional Treatment Models Break Down

Most residential treatment models are built around risk avoidance, not human functioning.

They are often:

  • sedentary by design
  • confined to indoor spaces
  • reliant on cognitive talk therapy
  • using dated “one size fits all” programming
  • lack of cultural elements and empowering language
  • structured around compliance rather than capability

For individuals with trauma, anxiety, depression, and long-term substance use, this environment can actually worsen symptoms. Emotional regulation is not restored by insight alone. Nervous systems heal through movement, rhythm, and repeated experiences of safety.

Exercise is one of the most consistently supported interventions for improving mental health and reducing substance use relapse risk:

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00190/full

Time in natural environments reduces rumination and stress-related neural activity associated with relapse vulnerability:

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1510459112

Yet many programs restrict outdoor activity entirely.

We built recovery systems that don’t resemble life and then wonder why people can’t survive once discharged.

What Recovery Actually Requires: Rebuilding the Human System

Sustainable recovery is not achieved by removing substances alone. It requires rebuilding four interconnected systems:

  1. The medical system (safety, withdrawal management, stabilization)
  2. The nervous system (regulation, stress tolerance, embodiment)
  3. The behavioural system (routine, movement, responsibility)
  4. The relational system (community, accountability, belonging)

Ignoring any one of these weakens the whole structure.

The Role of Physical Fitness, Somatic Therapy, and Land

Physical training is not a lifestyle add-on. It is a neurobiological intervention.

Strength training, boxing, yoga, qi gong, massage, acupuncture, and somatic work:

  • regulate neurotransmitters
  • reduce anxiety and depressive symptoms
  • improve sleep and stress tolerance
  • restore agency and self-trust

Yoga, breathwork, and body-based therapies activate parasympathetic pathways critical for trauma recovery:

https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/yoga-what-you-need-to-know

https://www.health.harvard.edu/pain/acupuncture-for-pain-relief

Land-based activity restores rhythm, humility, and responsibility in ways no indoor environment can replicate:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001393511830332X

The Missing Piece: Where Sacred Rebels Recovery Fits

Sacred Rebels Recovery exists because recovery systems often force people to choose between harm reduction, detox, or long-term treatment, with no continuity between them.

We are not a miracle. We are a bridge.

Our model integrates:

  • medically supported detox and stabilization
  • psychotherapy and counselling
  • harm reduction education
  • somatic therapy and nervous system work
  • physical fitness, boxing, yoga, qi gong
  • massage and acupuncture
  • outdoor recreation and land-based healing
  • small cohorts and long-term relationship

Over a four-year observational period, men who completed the program and remained engaged in aftercare showed significantly stronger stability and lower relapse patterns than those cycling through detox alone, aligning with broader evidence supporting integrated treatment:

https://www.recoveryanswers.org/research-post/integrated-treatment-substance-use-mental-health

The Grounded Truth

The overdose crisis will not end with slogans, enforcement, or one-size-fits-all treatment.

It will end when we stop pretending that:

  • people die because they don’t care
  • people who use drugs are criminals
  • insight alone heals trauma
  • confinement equals safety
  • policy failure is a personal defect
  • more police = less crime
  • a safe and legal regulated supply won’t save lives
  • harm reduction enables drug use
  • involuntary treatment is the only solution

People recover when systems stop setting them up to fail.

Sacred Rebels Recovery is not the solution. It is a missing piece in a fragmented system that has forgotten how humans actually heal.

Until we build more systems like that, we will keep counting bodies and calling it tragedy instead of what it really is:

A choice made by bureaucrats and those with vested interests that profit from criminalisation.

Leave a comment